Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Prior approval of the Adjudicating Authority under the proviso to section 33(5) is mandatory before a liquidator initiates arbitration for a corporate debtor in liquidation. As arbitral proceedings commence when the request for reference is received under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the arbitration invocation notice cannot validly take effect before that approval. The discussion distinguishes a lack of prior approval from voidness: section 33(5) does not expressly nullify proceedings commenced without approval. On a purposive construction, post facto approval renders the invocation effective from the approval date, and subsequent arbitral steps must proceed afresh from that date.
Prior approval of the Adjudicating Authority under the proviso to section 33(5) is mandatory before a liquidator initiates arbitration for a corporate debtor in liquidation. As arbitral proceedings commence when the request for reference is received under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the arbitration invocation notice cannot validly take effect before that approval. The discussion distinguishes a lack of prior approval from voidness: section 33(5) does not expressly nullify proceedings commenced without approval. On a purposive construction, post facto approval renders the invocation effective from the approval date, and subsequent arbitral steps must proceed afresh from that date.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.