Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
A reassessment notice under Section 148 must be issued to a living and correctly identified assessee; a notice issued to a deceased person is void from inception. Proceedings may continue against a legal representative only if validly initiated during the deceased's lifetime, while fresh proceedings require a notice directly to the legal representative within the statutory limitation period. Section 292B cannot cure this foundational jurisdictional defect, and Section 292BB does not apply where the assessee died before notice issuance; participation or waiver cannot confer jurisdiction. Equitable considerations cannot validate the proceedings. Quashing the void notice is not a finding or direction under Section 150 permitting a time-barred fresh reassessment notice.
A reassessment notice under Section 148 must be issued to a living and correctly identified assessee; a notice issued to a deceased person is void from inception. Proceedings may continue against a legal representative only if validly initiated during the deceased's lifetime, while fresh proceedings require a notice directly to the legal representative within the statutory limitation period. Section 292B cannot cure this foundational jurisdictional defect, and Section 292BB does not apply where the assessee died before notice issuance; participation or waiver cannot confer jurisdiction. Equitable considerations cannot validate the proceedings. Quashing the void notice is not a finding or direction under Section 150 permitting a time-barred fresh reassessment notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.