Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A reassessment notice under Section 148 must be issued to a living and correctly identified assessee; a notice issued to a deceased person is void from inception. Proceedings may continue against a legal representative only if validly initiated during the deceased's lifetime, while fresh proceedings require a notice directly to the legal representative within the statutory limitation period. Section 292B cannot cure this foundational jurisdictional defect, and Section 292BB does not apply where the assessee died before notice issuance; participation or waiver cannot confer jurisdiction. Equitable considerations cannot validate the proceedings. Quashing the void notice is not a finding or direction under Section 150 permitting a time-barred fresh reassessment notice.
A reassessment notice under Section 148 must be issued to a living and correctly identified assessee; a notice issued to a deceased person is void from inception. Proceedings may continue against a legal representative only if validly initiated during the deceased's lifetime, while fresh proceedings require a notice directly to the legal representative within the statutory limitation period. Section 292B cannot cure this foundational jurisdictional defect, and Section 292BB does not apply where the assessee died before notice issuance; participation or waiver cannot confer jurisdiction. Equitable considerations cannot validate the proceedings. Quashing the void notice is not a finding or direction under Section 150 permitting a time-barred fresh reassessment notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
