Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Reassessment beyond four years was invalid where the original scrutiny had specifically examined disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income and the assessee had provided relevant particulars. The revenue neither alleged failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts nor identified tangible material obtained after the original assessment showing income had escaped assessment. Reopening on re-examination of the same assessment record constituted a change of opinion. The High Court quashed the reassessment notice and consequential orders.
Reassessment beyond four years was invalid where the original scrutiny had specifically examined disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income and the assessee had provided relevant particulars. The revenue neither alleged failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts nor identified tangible material obtained after the original assessment showing income had escaped assessment. Reopening on re-examination of the same assessment record constituted a change of opinion. The High Court quashed the reassessment notice and consequential orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.