Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Reassessment beyond four years was invalid where the original scrutiny had specifically examined disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income and the assessee had provided relevant particulars. The revenue neither alleged failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts nor identified tangible material obtained after the original assessment showing income had escaped assessment. Reopening on re-examination of the same assessment record constituted a change of opinion. The High Court quashed the reassessment notice and consequential orders.
Reassessment beyond four years was invalid where the original scrutiny had specifically examined disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income and the assessee had provided relevant particulars. The revenue neither alleged failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts nor identified tangible material obtained after the original assessment showing income had escaped assessment. Reopening on re-examination of the same assessment record constituted a change of opinion. The High Court quashed the reassessment notice and consequential orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.