Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Reassessment beyond four years was invalid where the original scrutiny had specifically examined disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income and the assessee had provided relevant particulars. The revenue neither alleged failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts nor identified tangible material obtained after the original assessment showing income had escaped assessment. Reopening on re-examination of the same assessment record constituted a change of opinion. The High Court quashed the reassessment notice and consequential orders.
Reassessment beyond four years was invalid where the original scrutiny had specifically examined disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income and the assessee had provided relevant particulars. The revenue neither alleged failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts nor identified tangible material obtained after the original assessment showing income had escaped assessment. Reopening on re-examination of the same assessment record constituted a change of opinion. The High Court quashed the reassessment notice and consequential orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
