Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
For sales before 1 June 2003, the tax-collection-at-source entry for alcoholic liquor for human consumption expressly excluded Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL). As IMFL was undefined in the Income-tax Act, its meaning was considered in commercial and statutory context; the Tribunal's classification of beer as IMFL was treated as a reasonable view. State excise classifications could assist but could not control the Income-tax Act. The later deletion of the IMFL exclusion broadened the entry prospectively. Consequently, beer sales fell outside the earlier entry, so no tax-collection obligation, default liability, or consequential interest arose.
For sales before 1 June 2003, the tax-collection-at-source entry for alcoholic liquor for human consumption expressly excluded Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL). As IMFL was undefined in the Income-tax Act, its meaning was considered in commercial and statutory context; the Tribunal's classification of beer as IMFL was treated as a reasonable view. State excise classifications could assist but could not control the Income-tax Act. The later deletion of the IMFL exclusion broadened the entry prospectively. Consequently, beer sales fell outside the earlier entry, so no tax-collection obligation, default liability, or consequential interest arose.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
