Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Concluded refund proceedings cannot be reopened through protective recovery measures after refund entitlement has been affirmed in appellate proceedings and the challenge to the Tribunal's order has been dismissed by the Supreme Court. The notes state that sanctioned refunds thereby attain finality and cannot be disturbed merely because Revenue later adopts a contrary view. They further explain that unjust enrichment does not bar refund where excess duty initially reflected in customer accounts is returned through credit notes, so the duty incidence is not ultimately passed on. A Chartered Accountant's certificate may support that the claimant neither collected nor retained the excess amount.
Concluded refund proceedings cannot be reopened through protective recovery measures after refund entitlement has been affirmed in appellate proceedings and the challenge to the Tribunal's order has been dismissed by the Supreme Court. The notes state that sanctioned refunds thereby attain finality and cannot be disturbed merely because Revenue later adopts a contrary view. They further explain that unjust enrichment does not bar refund where excess duty initially reflected in customer accounts is returned through credit notes, so the duty incidence is not ultimately passed on. A Chartered Accountant's certificate may support that the claimant neither collected nor retained the excess amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.