Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Concluded refund proceedings cannot be reopened through protective recovery measures after refund entitlement has been affirmed in appellate proceedings and the challenge to the Tribunal's order has been dismissed by the Supreme Court. The notes state that sanctioned refunds thereby attain finality and cannot be disturbed merely because Revenue later adopts a contrary view. They further explain that unjust enrichment does not bar refund where excess duty initially reflected in customer accounts is returned through credit notes, so the duty incidence is not ultimately passed on. A Chartered Accountant's certificate may support that the claimant neither collected nor retained the excess amount.
Concluded refund proceedings cannot be reopened through protective recovery measures after refund entitlement has been affirmed in appellate proceedings and the challenge to the Tribunal's order has been dismissed by the Supreme Court. The notes state that sanctioned refunds thereby attain finality and cannot be disturbed merely because Revenue later adopts a contrary view. They further explain that unjust enrichment does not bar refund where excess duty initially reflected in customer accounts is returned through credit notes, so the duty incidence is not ultimately passed on. A Chartered Accountant's certificate may support that the claimant neither collected nor retained the excess amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.