Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Concluded refund proceedings cannot be reopened through protective recovery measures after refund entitlement has been affirmed in appellate proceedings and the challenge to the Tribunal's order has been dismissed by the Supreme Court. The notes state that sanctioned refunds thereby attain finality and cannot be disturbed merely because Revenue later adopts a contrary view. They further explain that unjust enrichment does not bar refund where excess duty initially reflected in customer accounts is returned through credit notes, so the duty incidence is not ultimately passed on. A Chartered Accountant's certificate may support that the claimant neither collected nor retained the excess amount.
Concluded refund proceedings cannot be reopened through protective recovery measures after refund entitlement has been affirmed in appellate proceedings and the challenge to the Tribunal's order has been dismissed by the Supreme Court. The notes state that sanctioned refunds thereby attain finality and cannot be disturbed merely because Revenue later adopts a contrary view. They further explain that unjust enrichment does not bar refund where excess duty initially reflected in customer accounts is returned through credit notes, so the duty incidence is not ultimately passed on. A Chartered Accountant's certificate may support that the claimant neither collected nor retained the excess amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.