Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Faceless assessment procedure requires a meaningful opportunity of personal hearing where sought, including access to video-conference facilities. The text records a prima facie concern that, after the assessee could not access the video-conference link because of a technical glitch, no further personal-hearing opportunity was provided before the assessment order was issued. It identifies possible non-compliance with the hearing procedure under the faceless assessment framework. The Revenue was given time to verify whether the final additions exceeded those proposed in the show-cause notice and whether video-conference access had been provided during the relevant period; the matter was listed for further instructions.
Faceless assessment procedure requires a meaningful opportunity of personal hearing where sought, including access to video-conference facilities. The text records a prima facie concern that, after the assessee could not access the video-conference link because of a technical glitch, no further personal-hearing opportunity was provided before the assessment order was issued. It identifies possible non-compliance with the hearing procedure under the faceless assessment framework. The Revenue was given time to verify whether the final additions exceeded those proposed in the show-cause notice and whether video-conference access had been provided during the relevant period; the matter was listed for further instructions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.