Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 56(2)(vii)(c) is discussed as applying where shares or securities are received from another person for inadequate consideration. The notes distinguish a fresh allotment from a transfer of existing property: newly issued shares arise from unissued share capital and do not pre-exist as property transferred by another person. On a strict construction of the deeming provision, the term "receives" is treated as requiring prior existence of the property. The discussion records that the provision was considered inapplicable to fresh share allotments, resulting in deletion of the related additions; the Revenue's challenge based on a sibling's earlier case was treated as academic.
Section 56(2)(vii)(c) is discussed as applying where shares or securities are received from another person for inadequate consideration. The notes distinguish a fresh allotment from a transfer of existing property: newly issued shares arise from unissued share capital and do not pre-exist as property transferred by another person. On a strict construction of the deeming provision, the term "receives" is treated as requiring prior existence of the property. The discussion records that the provision was considered inapplicable to fresh share allotments, resulting in deletion of the related additions; the Revenue's challenge based on a sibling's earlier case was treated as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.