Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 56(2)(vii)(c) is discussed as applying where shares or securities are received from another person for inadequate consideration. The notes distinguish a fresh allotment from a transfer of existing property: newly issued shares arise from unissued share capital and do not pre-exist as property transferred by another person. On a strict construction of the deeming provision, the term "receives" is treated as requiring prior existence of the property. The discussion records that the provision was considered inapplicable to fresh share allotments, resulting in deletion of the related additions; the Revenue's challenge based on a sibling's earlier case was treated as academic.
Section 56(2)(vii)(c) is discussed as applying where shares or securities are received from another person for inadequate consideration. The notes distinguish a fresh allotment from a transfer of existing property: newly issued shares arise from unissued share capital and do not pre-exist as property transferred by another person. On a strict construction of the deeming provision, the term "receives" is treated as requiring prior existence of the property. The discussion records that the provision was considered inapplicable to fresh share allotments, resulting in deletion of the related additions; the Revenue's challenge based on a sibling's earlier case was treated as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.