Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Section 56(2)(vii)(c) is discussed as applying where shares or securities are received from another person for inadequate consideration. The notes distinguish a fresh allotment from a transfer of existing property: newly issued shares arise from unissued share capital and do not pre-exist as property transferred by another person. On a strict construction of the deeming provision, the term "receives" is treated as requiring prior existence of the property. The discussion records that the provision was considered inapplicable to fresh share allotments, resulting in deletion of the related additions; the Revenue's challenge based on a sibling's earlier case was treated as academic.
Section 56(2)(vii)(c) is discussed as applying where shares or securities are received from another person for inadequate consideration. The notes distinguish a fresh allotment from a transfer of existing property: newly issued shares arise from unissued share capital and do not pre-exist as property transferred by another person. On a strict construction of the deeming provision, the term "receives" is treated as requiring prior existence of the property. The discussion records that the provision was considered inapplicable to fresh share allotments, resulting in deletion of the related additions; the Revenue's challenge based on a sibling's earlier case was treated as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.