Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Documented acquisition, dematerialised holdings, exchange-based sales and banking records support the genuineness of share-trading losses unless independent material links the taxpayer to accommodation entries, manipulation, unaccounted cash or collusion. General investigation material and third-party statements cannot be relied on without supplying adverse material and allowing cross-examination, as this breaches natural justice. Section 68 does not apply where dematerialised share sales explain the proceeds and the claimed loss reflects depletion of funds rather than an unexplained credit. Section 69B also cannot replace section 68 absent evidence that actual investment exceeded recorded investment, including unrecorded consideration or cash payments.
Documented acquisition, dematerialised holdings, exchange-based sales and banking records support the genuineness of share-trading losses unless independent material links the taxpayer to accommodation entries, manipulation, unaccounted cash or collusion. General investigation material and third-party statements cannot be relied on without supplying adverse material and allowing cross-examination, as this breaches natural justice. Section 68 does not apply where dematerialised share sales explain the proceeds and the claimed loss reflects depletion of funds rather than an unexplained credit. Section 69B also cannot replace section 68 absent evidence that actual investment exceeded recorded investment, including unrecorded consideration or cash payments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.