Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Documented acquisition, dematerialised holdings, exchange-based sales and banking records support the genuineness of share-trading losses unless independent material links the taxpayer to accommodation entries, manipulation, unaccounted cash or collusion. General investigation material and third-party statements cannot be relied on without supplying adverse material and allowing cross-examination, as this breaches natural justice. Section 68 does not apply where dematerialised share sales explain the proceeds and the claimed loss reflects depletion of funds rather than an unexplained credit. Section 69B also cannot replace section 68 absent evidence that actual investment exceeded recorded investment, including unrecorded consideration or cash payments.
Documented acquisition, dematerialised holdings, exchange-based sales and banking records support the genuineness of share-trading losses unless independent material links the taxpayer to accommodation entries, manipulation, unaccounted cash or collusion. General investigation material and third-party statements cannot be relied on without supplying adverse material and allowing cross-examination, as this breaches natural justice. Section 68 does not apply where dematerialised share sales explain the proceeds and the claimed loss reflects depletion of funds rather than an unexplained credit. Section 69B also cannot replace section 68 absent evidence that actual investment exceeded recorded investment, including unrecorded consideration or cash payments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.