Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking and capital-receipt principles sustained taxpayer relief, while unsupported property-advance write-offs remained disallo...
Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
661 to 680 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency moratorium under the IBC protects the corporate...
Insolvency moratorium does not shield company officers from cheque dishonour prosecution for liability arising before corporate insolvency proceedings.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Insolvency moratorium under the IBC protects the corporate debtor and postpones civil debt enforcement, but does not halt cheque dishonour prosecution against directors or other natural persons subject to vicarious liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act. Liability is assessed by the accused's status when the cheques were issued and dishonoured; subsequent appointment of an insolvency professional or liquidator, and resulting loss of managerial control, does not erase criminal liability already crystallised. Whether an accused was in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the relevant time remains a matter for trial on evidence.
Insolvency moratorium under the IBC protects the corporate debtor and postpones civil debt enforcement, but does not halt cheque dishonour prosecution against directors or other natural persons subject to vicarious liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act. Liability is assessed by the accused's status when the cheques were issued and dishonoured; subsequent appointment of an insolvency professional or liquidator, and resulting loss of managerial control, does not erase criminal liability already crystallised. Whether an accused was in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the relevant time remains a matter for trial on evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.