Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Insolvency moratorium under the IBC protects the corporate...
Insolvency moratorium does not shield company officers from cheque dishonour prosecution for liability arising before corporate insolvency proceedings.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Insolvency moratorium under the IBC protects the corporate debtor and postpones civil debt enforcement, but does not halt cheque dishonour prosecution against directors or other natural persons subject to vicarious liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act. Liability is assessed by the accused's status when the cheques were issued and dishonoured; subsequent appointment of an insolvency professional or liquidator, and resulting loss of managerial control, does not erase criminal liability already crystallised. Whether an accused was in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the relevant time remains a matter for trial on evidence.
Insolvency moratorium under the IBC protects the corporate debtor and postpones civil debt enforcement, but does not halt cheque dishonour prosecution against directors or other natural persons subject to vicarious liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act. Liability is assessed by the accused's status when the cheques were issued and dishonoured; subsequent appointment of an insolvency professional or liquidator, and resulting loss of managerial control, does not erase criminal liability already crystallised. Whether an accused was in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the relevant time remains a matter for trial on evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.