Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 143(1) processing may continue after issuance of a scrutiny notice under section 143(2) for returns from assessment years commencing on or after 1 April 2017. The note explains that merger is issue-specific: only matters actually examined and decided in subsequent scrutiny merge, so unexamined processing adjustments remain separate matters arising from the intimation. It also states that an Assessing Officer need not revisit CPC adjustments merely because scrutiny follows. Cross-charged ESOP costs reimbursed by an Indian subsidiary to its foreign parent are described as employee compensation incurred wholly and exclusively for business, rather than capital expenditure, where the subsidiary neither issues shares nor acquires a capital asset.
Section 143(1) processing may continue after issuance of a scrutiny notice under section 143(2) for returns from assessment years commencing on or after 1 April 2017. The note explains that merger is issue-specific: only matters actually examined and decided in subsequent scrutiny merge, so unexamined processing adjustments remain separate matters arising from the intimation. It also states that an Assessing Officer need not revisit CPC adjustments merely because scrutiny follows. Cross-charged ESOP costs reimbursed by an Indian subsidiary to its foreign parent are described as employee compensation incurred wholly and exclusively for business, rather than capital expenditure, where the subsidiary neither issues shares nor acquires a capital asset.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
