Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Section 143(1) processing may continue after issuance of a scrutiny notice under section 143(2) for returns from assessment years commencing on or after 1 April 2017. The note explains that merger is issue-specific: only matters actually examined and decided in subsequent scrutiny merge, so unexamined processing adjustments remain separate matters arising from the intimation. It also states that an Assessing Officer need not revisit CPC adjustments merely because scrutiny follows. Cross-charged ESOP costs reimbursed by an Indian subsidiary to its foreign parent are described as employee compensation incurred wholly and exclusively for business, rather than capital expenditure, where the subsidiary neither issues shares nor acquires a capital asset.
Section 143(1) processing may continue after issuance of a scrutiny notice under section 143(2) for returns from assessment years commencing on or after 1 April 2017. The note explains that merger is issue-specific: only matters actually examined and decided in subsequent scrutiny merge, so unexamined processing adjustments remain separate matters arising from the intimation. It also states that an Assessing Officer need not revisit CPC adjustments merely because scrutiny follows. Cross-charged ESOP costs reimbursed by an Indian subsidiary to its foreign parent are described as employee compensation incurred wholly and exclusively for business, rather than capital expenditure, where the subsidiary neither issues shares nor acquires a capital asset.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
