Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
Electronic issuance of a reassessment notice occurs when it is dispatched through the ITBA system, not when digitally signed or generated. A notice recorded as issued on 1 April 2021 was therefore governed by the amended reassessment regime and required compliance with the pre-notice procedure under section 148A; its non-compliance rendered the notice invalid and vitiated the consequential reassessment order. Independently, where reassessment is initiated beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year, sanction must come from the specified higher authority under section 151(ii). Approval by the Principal Commissioner was incompetent, providing a separate ground to quash the notice.
Electronic issuance of a reassessment notice occurs when it is dispatched through the ITBA system, not when digitally signed or generated. A notice recorded as issued on 1 April 2021 was therefore governed by the amended reassessment regime and required compliance with the pre-notice procedure under section 148A; its non-compliance rendered the notice invalid and vitiated the consequential reassessment order. Independently, where reassessment is initiated beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year, sanction must come from the specified higher authority under section 151(ii). Approval by the Principal Commissioner was incompetent, providing a separate ground to quash the notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.