Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Electronic issuance of a reassessment notice occurs when it is dispatched through the ITBA system, not when digitally signed or generated. A notice recorded as issued on 1 April 2021 was therefore governed by the amended reassessment regime and required compliance with the pre-notice procedure under section 148A; its non-compliance rendered the notice invalid and vitiated the consequential reassessment order. Independently, where reassessment is initiated beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year, sanction must come from the specified higher authority under section 151(ii). Approval by the Principal Commissioner was incompetent, providing a separate ground to quash the notice.
Electronic issuance of a reassessment notice occurs when it is dispatched through the ITBA system, not when digitally signed or generated. A notice recorded as issued on 1 April 2021 was therefore governed by the amended reassessment regime and required compliance with the pre-notice procedure under section 148A; its non-compliance rendered the notice invalid and vitiated the consequential reassessment order. Independently, where reassessment is initiated beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year, sanction must come from the specified higher authority under section 151(ii). Approval by the Principal Commissioner was incompetent, providing a separate ground to quash the notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.