Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Electronic issuance of a reassessment notice occurs when it is dispatched through the ITBA system, not when digitally signed or generated. A notice recorded as issued on 1 April 2021 was therefore governed by the amended reassessment regime and required compliance with the pre-notice procedure under section 148A; its non-compliance rendered the notice invalid and vitiated the consequential reassessment order. Independently, where reassessment is initiated beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year, sanction must come from the specified higher authority under section 151(ii). Approval by the Principal Commissioner was incompetent, providing a separate ground to quash the notice.
Electronic issuance of a reassessment notice occurs when it is dispatched through the ITBA system, not when digitally signed or generated. A notice recorded as issued on 1 April 2021 was therefore governed by the amended reassessment regime and required compliance with the pre-notice procedure under section 148A; its non-compliance rendered the notice invalid and vitiated the consequential reassessment order. Independently, where reassessment is initiated beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year, sanction must come from the specified higher authority under section 151(ii). Approval by the Principal Commissioner was incompetent, providing a separate ground to quash the notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
