Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CISF airport security screening and preventive checks may extend to city-side airport areas during heightened security alerts. The article notes that interception of a passenger after customs clearance, based on suspicion concerning commercial quantities of goods, was treated as a security-profiling measure rather than an exercise of customs-enforcement power. It further states that CISF secured the goods and handed them to police and Customs, while competent Customs officers conducted the seizure through a panchanama with independent witnesses and stated search safeguards. On this account, the subsequent customs seizure was not considered vitiated by the prior CISF interception, and the writ petition was dismissed.
CISF airport security screening and preventive checks may extend to city-side airport areas during heightened security alerts. The article notes that interception of a passenger after customs clearance, based on suspicion concerning commercial quantities of goods, was treated as a security-profiling measure rather than an exercise of customs-enforcement power. It further states that CISF secured the goods and handed them to police and Customs, while competent Customs officers conducted the seizure through a panchanama with independent witnesses and stated search safeguards. On this account, the subsequent customs seizure was not considered vitiated by the prior CISF interception, and the writ petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.