Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Duty exemption under transferable DFIA licences cannot be denied to an importer merely on alleged licence irregularities where proceedings against the exporter resulted in the demand being dropped and the licences remained uncancelled. The notes state that, absent proof that the importer fraudulently used irregular licences, the customs duty demand is unsustainable on merits. They further state that the extended limitation period for duty recovery cannot be invoked once the allegation of fraudulent use fails. The impugned confirmation of customs duty, interest and the extended-period demand was set aside, with consequential benefits under law.
Duty exemption under transferable DFIA licences cannot be denied to an importer merely on alleged licence irregularities where proceedings against the exporter resulted in the demand being dropped and the licences remained uncancelled. The notes state that, absent proof that the importer fraudulently used irregular licences, the customs duty demand is unsustainable on merits. They further state that the extended limitation period for duty recovery cannot be invoked once the allegation of fraudulent use fails. The impugned confirmation of customs duty, interest and the extended-period demand was set aside, with consequential benefits under law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.