Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Duty exemption under transferable DFIA licences cannot be denied to an importer merely on alleged licence irregularities where proceedings against the exporter resulted in the demand being dropped and the licences remained uncancelled. The notes state that, absent proof that the importer fraudulently used irregular licences, the customs duty demand is unsustainable on merits. They further state that the extended limitation period for duty recovery cannot be invoked once the allegation of fraudulent use fails. The impugned confirmation of customs duty, interest and the extended-period demand was set aside, with consequential benefits under law.
Duty exemption under transferable DFIA licences cannot be denied to an importer merely on alleged licence irregularities where proceedings against the exporter resulted in the demand being dropped and the licences remained uncancelled. The notes state that, absent proof that the importer fraudulently used irregular licences, the customs duty demand is unsustainable on merits. They further state that the extended limitation period for duty recovery cannot be invoked once the allegation of fraudulent use fails. The impugned confirmation of customs duty, interest and the extended-period demand was set aside, with consequential benefits under law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.