Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Duty exemption under transferable DFIA licences cannot be denied to an importer merely on alleged licence irregularities where proceedings against the exporter resulted in the demand being dropped and the licences remained uncancelled. The notes state that, absent proof that the importer fraudulently used irregular licences, the customs duty demand is unsustainable on merits. They further state that the extended limitation period for duty recovery cannot be invoked once the allegation of fraudulent use fails. The impugned confirmation of customs duty, interest and the extended-period demand was set aside, with consequential benefits under law.
Duty exemption under transferable DFIA licences cannot be denied to an importer merely on alleged licence irregularities where proceedings against the exporter resulted in the demand being dropped and the licences remained uncancelled. The notes state that, absent proof that the importer fraudulently used irregular licences, the customs duty demand is unsustainable on merits. They further state that the extended limitation period for duty recovery cannot be invoked once the allegation of fraudulent use fails. The impugned confirmation of customs duty, interest and the extended-period demand was set aside, with consequential benefits under law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.