Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A company may respond to a PMLA investigation summons through an...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and attendance.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
A company may respond to a PMLA investigation summons through an authorised agent or signatory where the summons contemplates attendance by a Director or authorised signatory. The HC permitted such representation because the company and its Directors undertook to cooperate with the investigation and to appear whenever required, and the authority had no objection to recording the agent's statement. The authority was directed to allow the authorised representative's appearance, without relieving the company or its Directors of their obligation to cooperate and attend when required.
A company may respond to a PMLA investigation summons through an authorised agent or signatory where the summons contemplates attendance by a Director or authorised signatory. The HC permitted such representation because the company and its Directors undertook to cooperate with the investigation and to appear whenever required, and the authority had no objection to recording the agent's statement. The authority was directed to allow the authorised representative's appearance, without relieving the company or its Directors of their obligation to cooperate and attend when required.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.