Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Assignment of leasehold rights by a lessee to a third-party assignee was treated by the Gujarat High Court as a transfer of benefits arising from land, not a taxable supply of services under section 7(1)(a) of the GST Act read with Schedules II and III. The Court applied strict construction of taxing provisions and concluded that GST was not leviable on the transaction. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions, referring to dismissal of a similar special leave petition.
Assignment of leasehold rights by a lessee to a third-party assignee was treated by the Gujarat High Court as a transfer of benefits arising from land, not a taxable supply of services under section 7(1)(a) of the GST Act read with Schedules II and III. The Court applied strict construction of taxing provisions and concluded that GST was not leviable on the transaction. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions, referring to dismissal of a similar special leave petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.