Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
De novo GST adjudication was permitted despite the taxable person's failure to respond to show-cause notices, attend personal hearings, or file a timely statutory appeal. Upon an undertaking to deposit 25% of the disputed tax, the HC required the taxable person to submit a substantiated reply with supporting documents and directed fresh adjudication on merits. The impugned orders were to operate as addenda to the show-cause notices for this purpose. Any consequential bank attachment was to be vacated subject to compliance. If the deposit and reply requirements were not met, tax authorities could recover the demand in accordance with law.
De novo GST adjudication was permitted despite the taxable person's failure to respond to show-cause notices, attend personal hearings, or file a timely statutory appeal. Upon an undertaking to deposit 25% of the disputed tax, the HC required the taxable person to submit a substantiated reply with supporting documents and directed fresh adjudication on merits. The impugned orders were to operate as addenda to the show-cause notices for this purpose. Any consequential bank attachment was to be vacated subject to compliance. If the deposit and reply requirements were not met, tax authorities could recover the demand in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
