Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
De novo GST adjudication was permitted despite the taxable person's failure to respond to show-cause notices, attend personal hearings, or file a timely statutory appeal. Upon an undertaking to deposit 25% of the disputed tax, the HC required the taxable person to submit a substantiated reply with supporting documents and directed fresh adjudication on merits. The impugned orders were to operate as addenda to the show-cause notices for this purpose. Any consequential bank attachment was to be vacated subject to compliance. If the deposit and reply requirements were not met, tax authorities could recover the demand in accordance with law.
De novo GST adjudication was permitted despite the taxable person's failure to respond to show-cause notices, attend personal hearings, or file a timely statutory appeal. Upon an undertaking to deposit 25% of the disputed tax, the HC required the taxable person to submit a substantiated reply with supporting documents and directed fresh adjudication on merits. The impugned orders were to operate as addenda to the show-cause notices for this purpose. Any consequential bank attachment was to be vacated subject to compliance. If the deposit and reply requirements were not met, tax authorities could recover the demand in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
