Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Section 292A of the Income-tax Act expressly bars the application of section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Probation of Offenders Act to persons convicted of Income-tax Act offences, except those under eighteen years of age. In relation to a conviction for making a false statement in an income-tax return under section 277, the High Court noted that the trial court had overlooked this statutory prohibition when granting probation. The order granting probation was therefore set aside, while the conviction remained undisturbed. The matter was remitted for fresh determination of sentence after hearing both sides.
Section 292A of the Income-tax Act expressly bars the application of section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Probation of Offenders Act to persons convicted of Income-tax Act offences, except those under eighteen years of age. In relation to a conviction for making a false statement in an income-tax return under section 277, the High Court noted that the trial court had overlooked this statutory prohibition when granting probation. The order granting probation was therefore set aside, while the conviction remained undisturbed. The matter was remitted for fresh determination of sentence after hearing both sides.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.