Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Transfer-pricing comparability under TNMM requires close...
Transfer pricing comparability requires functional alignment and permits working capital adjustment, while APA margins cannot govern non-covered years.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer-pricing comparability under TNMM requires close functional alignment rather than broad product similarity. Companies engaged in holograms, paper, films or decorative components were treated as unsuitable comparables for aseptic carton packaging because of differences in products, inputs, intangibles, export orientation and segmental data. A comparable with a different financial year may be considered where corresponding-period data can be extrapolated, and working capital adjustment requires examination where supported by segment practice and prior treatment. For IT-enabled services, medical transcription may qualify as an ITES comparable, while related-party transaction filters and additional comparables require verification under the functional, asset and risk test. A bilateral APA applies only to its covered period; non-covered transactions require arm's length price determination under the Act and Rules.
Transfer-pricing comparability under TNMM requires close functional alignment rather than broad product similarity. Companies engaged in holograms, paper, films or decorative components were treated as unsuitable comparables for aseptic carton packaging because of differences in products, inputs, intangibles, export orientation and segmental data. A comparable with a different financial year may be considered where corresponding-period data can be extrapolated, and working capital adjustment requires examination where supported by segment practice and prior treatment. For IT-enabled services, medical transcription may qualify as an ITES comparable, while related-party transaction filters and additional comparables require verification under the functional, asset and risk test. A bilateral APA applies only to its covered period; non-covered transactions require arm's length price determination under the Act and Rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.