Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Transfer-pricing comparability under TNMM requires close...
Transfer pricing comparability requires functional alignment and permits working capital adjustment, while APA margins cannot govern non-covered years.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer-pricing comparability under TNMM requires close functional alignment rather than broad product similarity. Companies engaged in holograms, paper, films or decorative components were treated as unsuitable comparables for aseptic carton packaging because of differences in products, inputs, intangibles, export orientation and segmental data. A comparable with a different financial year may be considered where corresponding-period data can be extrapolated, and working capital adjustment requires examination where supported by segment practice and prior treatment. For IT-enabled services, medical transcription may qualify as an ITES comparable, while related-party transaction filters and additional comparables require verification under the functional, asset and risk test. A bilateral APA applies only to its covered period; non-covered transactions require arm's length price determination under the Act and Rules.
Transfer-pricing comparability under TNMM requires close functional alignment rather than broad product similarity. Companies engaged in holograms, paper, films or decorative components were treated as unsuitable comparables for aseptic carton packaging because of differences in products, inputs, intangibles, export orientation and segmental data. A comparable with a different financial year may be considered where corresponding-period data can be extrapolated, and working capital adjustment requires examination where supported by segment practice and prior treatment. For IT-enabled services, medical transcription may qualify as an ITES comparable, while related-party transaction filters and additional comparables require verification under the functional, asset and risk test. A bilateral APA applies only to its covered period; non-covered transactions require arm's length price determination under the Act and Rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.