Clean slate principle extinguishes uncrystallised operational claims and bars continuation of pending recovery and arbitral proceedings after plan app...
Works contract classification governs composite layout-development contracts where VAT-paid goods are transferred alongside construction and infrastru...
Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filin...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Transfer-pricing comparability under TNMM requires close...
Transfer pricing comparability requires functional alignment and permits working capital adjustment, while APA margins cannot govern non-covered years.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer-pricing comparability under TNMM requires close functional alignment rather than broad product similarity. Companies engaged in holograms, paper, films or decorative components were treated as unsuitable comparables for aseptic carton packaging because of differences in products, inputs, intangibles, export orientation and segmental data. A comparable with a different financial year may be considered where corresponding-period data can be extrapolated, and working capital adjustment requires examination where supported by segment practice and prior treatment. For IT-enabled services, medical transcription may qualify as an ITES comparable, while related-party transaction filters and additional comparables require verification under the functional, asset and risk test. A bilateral APA applies only to its covered period; non-covered transactions require arm's length price determination under the Act and Rules.
Transfer-pricing comparability under TNMM requires close functional alignment rather than broad product similarity. Companies engaged in holograms, paper, films or decorative components were treated as unsuitable comparables for aseptic carton packaging because of differences in products, inputs, intangibles, export orientation and segmental data. A comparable with a different financial year may be considered where corresponding-period data can be extrapolated, and working capital adjustment requires examination where supported by segment practice and prior treatment. For IT-enabled services, medical transcription may qualify as an ITES comparable, while related-party transaction filters and additional comparables require verification under the functional, asset and risk test. A bilateral APA applies only to its covered period; non-covered transactions require arm's length price determination under the Act and Rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.