Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Reassessment cannot be sustained for an unrelated income item where the income forming the recorded reasons is accepted and no addition is made on that basis. The notes explain that an Assessing Officer who initiated reassessment to examine share application money could not independently add an unsecured loan identified through separate information without issuing a fresh notice under section 148. Applying the principle in Jet Airways and a subsequent ITAT decision, the reassessment addition was treated as outside the permissible scope of reassessment. The assessee succeeded on this legal issue, and the merits of the unsecured-loan addition and other grounds were not examined.
Reassessment cannot be sustained for an unrelated income item where the income forming the recorded reasons is accepted and no addition is made on that basis. The notes explain that an Assessing Officer who initiated reassessment to examine share application money could not independently add an unsecured loan identified through separate information without issuing a fresh notice under section 148. Applying the principle in Jet Airways and a subsequent ITAT decision, the reassessment addition was treated as outside the permissible scope of reassessment. The assessee succeeded on this legal issue, and the merits of the unsecured-loan addition and other grounds were not examined.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.