Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 2(11) of the Black Money Act treats a foreign asset as undisclosed where no explanation of its acquisition source is provided or the explanation is unsatisfactory. The text explains that foreign investments and bank assets sourced from gifts received during Belgian residency were supported by documents, banking records, donor statements and subsequent verification. As no material linked the assets to Indian taxable income, undisclosed business activity, accommodation arrangements or transfers of untaxed Indian funds, suspicion could not replace evidence. The foreign-asset addition was deleted, and the consequential penalty was also deleted because its underlying addition did not survive.
Section 2(11) of the Black Money Act treats a foreign asset as undisclosed where no explanation of its acquisition source is provided or the explanation is unsatisfactory. The text explains that foreign investments and bank assets sourced from gifts received during Belgian residency were supported by documents, banking records, donor statements and subsequent verification. As no material linked the assets to Indian taxable income, undisclosed business activity, accommodation arrangements or transfers of untaxed Indian funds, suspicion could not replace evidence. The foreign-asset addition was deleted, and the consequential penalty was also deleted because its underlying addition did not survive.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
