Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 2(11) of the Black Money Act treats a foreign asset as undisclosed where no explanation of its acquisition source is provided or the explanation is unsatisfactory. The text explains that foreign investments and bank assets sourced from gifts received during Belgian residency were supported by documents, banking records, donor statements and subsequent verification. As no material linked the assets to Indian taxable income, undisclosed business activity, accommodation arrangements or transfers of untaxed Indian funds, suspicion could not replace evidence. The foreign-asset addition was deleted, and the consequential penalty was also deleted because its underlying addition did not survive.
Section 2(11) of the Black Money Act treats a foreign asset as undisclosed where no explanation of its acquisition source is provided or the explanation is unsatisfactory. The text explains that foreign investments and bank assets sourced from gifts received during Belgian residency were supported by documents, banking records, donor statements and subsequent verification. As no material linked the assets to Indian taxable income, undisclosed business activity, accommodation arrangements or transfers of untaxed Indian funds, suspicion could not replace evidence. The foreign-asset addition was deleted, and the consequential penalty was also deleted because its underlying addition did not survive.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.