Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Section 2(11) of the Black Money Act treats a foreign asset as undisclosed where no explanation of its acquisition source is provided or the explanation is unsatisfactory. The text explains that foreign investments and bank assets sourced from gifts received during Belgian residency were supported by documents, banking records, donor statements and subsequent verification. As no material linked the assets to Indian taxable income, undisclosed business activity, accommodation arrangements or transfers of untaxed Indian funds, suspicion could not replace evidence. The foreign-asset addition was deleted, and the consequential penalty was also deleted because its underlying addition did not survive.
Section 2(11) of the Black Money Act treats a foreign asset as undisclosed where no explanation of its acquisition source is provided or the explanation is unsatisfactory. The text explains that foreign investments and bank assets sourced from gifts received during Belgian residency were supported by documents, banking records, donor statements and subsequent verification. As no material linked the assets to Indian taxable income, undisclosed business activity, accommodation arrangements or transfers of untaxed Indian funds, suspicion could not replace evidence. The foreign-asset addition was deleted, and the consequential penalty was also deleted because its underlying addition did not survive.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.