Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Natural justice required a reasoned assessment of cryptocurrency exchanges' role, control over transactions and assets, ownership of crypto assets in pool wallets, knowledge of allegedly tainted transactions, and the nexus between frozen assets and proceeds of crime. The Tribunal found that the Adjudicating Authority had not addressed the platforms' material submissions or recorded specific findings on these issues. As the factual and legal questions required examination on the available evidence, the Tribunal set aside the order permitting retention of seized devices and continuation of freezing of bank funds and crypto assets, remanding the matters for fresh adjudication by a speaking order without deciding the merits conclusively.
Natural justice required a reasoned assessment of cryptocurrency exchanges' role, control over transactions and assets, ownership of crypto assets in pool wallets, knowledge of allegedly tainted transactions, and the nexus between frozen assets and proceeds of crime. The Tribunal found that the Adjudicating Authority had not addressed the platforms' material submissions or recorded specific findings on these issues. As the factual and legal questions required examination on the available evidence, the Tribunal set aside the order permitting retention of seized devices and continuation of freezing of bank funds and crypto assets, remanding the matters for fresh adjudication by a speaking order without deciding the merits conclusively.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
