Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
841 to 860 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Natural justice required a reasoned assessment of cryptocurrency exchanges' role, control over transactions and assets, ownership of crypto assets in pool wallets, knowledge of allegedly tainted transactions, and the nexus between frozen assets and proceeds of crime. The Tribunal found that the Adjudicating Authority had not addressed the platforms' material submissions or recorded specific findings on these issues. As the factual and legal questions required examination on the available evidence, the Tribunal set aside the order permitting retention of seized devices and continuation of freezing of bank funds and crypto assets, remanding the matters for fresh adjudication by a speaking order without deciding the merits conclusively.
Natural justice required a reasoned assessment of cryptocurrency exchanges' role, control over transactions and assets, ownership of crypto assets in pool wallets, knowledge of allegedly tainted transactions, and the nexus between frozen assets and proceeds of crime. The Tribunal found that the Adjudicating Authority had not addressed the platforms' material submissions or recorded specific findings on these issues. As the factual and legal questions required examination on the available evidence, the Tribunal set aside the order permitting retention of seized devices and continuation of freezing of bank funds and crypto assets, remanding the matters for fresh adjudication by a speaking order without deciding the merits conclusively.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.