Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Natural justice required a reasoned assessment of cryptocurrency exchanges' role, control over transactions and assets, ownership of crypto assets in pool wallets, knowledge of allegedly tainted transactions, and the nexus between frozen assets and proceeds of crime. The Tribunal found that the Adjudicating Authority had not addressed the platforms' material submissions or recorded specific findings on these issues. As the factual and legal questions required examination on the available evidence, the Tribunal set aside the order permitting retention of seized devices and continuation of freezing of bank funds and crypto assets, remanding the matters for fresh adjudication by a speaking order without deciding the merits conclusively.
Natural justice required a reasoned assessment of cryptocurrency exchanges' role, control over transactions and assets, ownership of crypto assets in pool wallets, knowledge of allegedly tainted transactions, and the nexus between frozen assets and proceeds of crime. The Tribunal found that the Adjudicating Authority had not addressed the platforms' material submissions or recorded specific findings on these issues. As the factual and legal questions required examination on the available evidence, the Tribunal set aside the order permitting retention of seized devices and continuation of freezing of bank funds and crypto assets, remanding the matters for fresh adjudication by a speaking order without deciding the merits conclusively.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.