Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Statutory limitation for GST appeals under Section 107 of the CGST/UKGST Act is treated as an integral and exhaustive part of the appellate remedy. The prescribed appeal period and the limited condonable extension define the Appellate Authority's jurisdiction; therefore, delay beyond that extension cannot be condoned through Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The discussion distinguishes a Supreme Court ruling under beneficial land-acquisition legislation, whose remedial purpose differs from the self-contained fiscal framework of GST. It maintains that fiscal precedents on expressly limited appellate condonation continue to govern unless expressly overruled or distinguished. Individual writ petitions remain for consideration on their respective facts.
Statutory limitation for GST appeals under Section 107 of the CGST/UKGST Act is treated as an integral and exhaustive part of the appellate remedy. The prescribed appeal period and the limited condonable extension define the Appellate Authority's jurisdiction; therefore, delay beyond that extension cannot be condoned through Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The discussion distinguishes a Supreme Court ruling under beneficial land-acquisition legislation, whose remedial purpose differs from the self-contained fiscal framework of GST. It maintains that fiscal precedents on expressly limited appellate condonation continue to govern unless expressly overruled or distinguished. Individual writ petitions remain for consideration on their respective facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
