Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Statutory limitation for GST appeals under Section 107 of the CGST/UKGST Act is treated as an integral and exhaustive part of the appellate remedy. The prescribed appeal period and the limited condonable extension define the Appellate Authority's jurisdiction; therefore, delay beyond that extension cannot be condoned through Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The discussion distinguishes a Supreme Court ruling under beneficial land-acquisition legislation, whose remedial purpose differs from the self-contained fiscal framework of GST. It maintains that fiscal precedents on expressly limited appellate condonation continue to govern unless expressly overruled or distinguished. Individual writ petitions remain for consideration on their respective facts.
Statutory limitation for GST appeals under Section 107 of the CGST/UKGST Act is treated as an integral and exhaustive part of the appellate remedy. The prescribed appeal period and the limited condonable extension define the Appellate Authority's jurisdiction; therefore, delay beyond that extension cannot be condoned through Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The discussion distinguishes a Supreme Court ruling under beneficial land-acquisition legislation, whose remedial purpose differs from the self-contained fiscal framework of GST. It maintains that fiscal precedents on expressly limited appellate condonation continue to govern unless expressly overruled or distinguished. Individual writ petitions remain for consideration on their respective facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
