Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Disputed input tax credit claimed to have been reversed before issuance of the show-cause notice required verification through the rectification application and relevant returns. As that verification had not been undertaken, the GST demand was remitted for fresh adjudication on merits. The remand was conditional on deposit of 25% of the disputed tax, with adjustment for properly substantiated prior payments or recoveries. Upon compliance, any consequential bank attachment was to be vacated.
Disputed input tax credit claimed to have been reversed before issuance of the show-cause notice required verification through the rectification application and relevant returns. As that verification had not been undertaken, the GST demand was remitted for fresh adjudication on merits. The remand was conditional on deposit of 25% of the disputed tax, with adjustment for properly substantiated prior payments or recoveries. Upon compliance, any consequential bank attachment was to be vacated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
