Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Section 56(2)(x) is described as applying only when immovable...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed income.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 56(2)(x) is described as applying only when immovable property is actually received during the relevant previous year. Execution and registration of a redevelopment agreement, without completed construction, possession, or enjoyment of permanent alternate accommodation, creates a contractual right to future accommodation rather than receipt of immovable property. Allotment of such accommodation in exchange for relinquishment of tenancy rights is characterised as a reciprocal commercial exchange, not a transfer without consideration. The discussion further states that the charging deeming fiction requires strict construction and should not be extended to this redevelopment arrangement.
Section 56(2)(x) is described as applying only when immovable property is actually received during the relevant previous year. Execution and registration of a redevelopment agreement, without completed construction, possession, or enjoyment of permanent alternate accommodation, creates a contractual right to future accommodation rather than receipt of immovable property. Allotment of such accommodation in exchange for relinquishment of tenancy rights is characterised as a reciprocal commercial exchange, not a transfer without consideration. The discussion further states that the charging deeming fiction requires strict construction and should not be extended to this redevelopment arrangement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.