Statutory transfer formalities invalidated alleged share and property transfers, while retrospective record manipulation constituted oppression and mi...
Provisional attachment of laundered funds and equivalent-value property sustained, with statutory protection limited to pension, gratuity and providen...
Insolvency moratorium does not shield company officers from cheque dishonour prosecution for liability arising before corporate insolvency proceedings...
Section 56(2)(x) is described as applying only when immovable...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed income.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 56(2)(x) is described as applying only when immovable property is actually received during the relevant previous year. Execution and registration of a redevelopment agreement, without completed construction, possession, or enjoyment of permanent alternate accommodation, creates a contractual right to future accommodation rather than receipt of immovable property. Allotment of such accommodation in exchange for relinquishment of tenancy rights is characterised as a reciprocal commercial exchange, not a transfer without consideration. The discussion further states that the charging deeming fiction requires strict construction and should not be extended to this redevelopment arrangement.
Section 56(2)(x) is described as applying only when immovable property is actually received during the relevant previous year. Execution and registration of a redevelopment agreement, without completed construction, possession, or enjoyment of permanent alternate accommodation, creates a contractual right to future accommodation rather than receipt of immovable property. Allotment of such accommodation in exchange for relinquishment of tenancy rights is characterised as a reciprocal commercial exchange, not a transfer without consideration. The discussion further states that the charging deeming fiction requires strict construction and should not be extended to this redevelopment arrangement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.