Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Section 56(2)(x) is described as applying only when immovable...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed income.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 56(2)(x) is described as applying only when immovable property is actually received during the relevant previous year. Execution and registration of a redevelopment agreement, without completed construction, possession, or enjoyment of permanent alternate accommodation, creates a contractual right to future accommodation rather than receipt of immovable property. Allotment of such accommodation in exchange for relinquishment of tenancy rights is characterised as a reciprocal commercial exchange, not a transfer without consideration. The discussion further states that the charging deeming fiction requires strict construction and should not be extended to this redevelopment arrangement.
Section 56(2)(x) is described as applying only when immovable property is actually received during the relevant previous year. Execution and registration of a redevelopment agreement, without completed construction, possession, or enjoyment of permanent alternate accommodation, creates a contractual right to future accommodation rather than receipt of immovable property. Allotment of such accommodation in exchange for relinquishment of tenancy rights is characterised as a reciprocal commercial exchange, not a transfer without consideration. The discussion further states that the charging deeming fiction requires strict construction and should not be extended to this redevelopment arrangement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.