Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Section 154 rectification applications must be filed within four years from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be amended was passed. The notes state that section 154(7) is clear and unambiguous and contains no provision allowing condonation of delay for reasonable cause. On a literal construction, expiry of this period removes the authority's jurisdiction to entertain a rectification application, including applications seeking correction of income returned and processed under section 143(1). Accordingly, the delayed applications were treated as time-barred, their rejection was upheld, and the related appeals were dismissed.
Section 154 rectification applications must be filed within four years from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be amended was passed. The notes state that section 154(7) is clear and unambiguous and contains no provision allowing condonation of delay for reasonable cause. On a literal construction, expiry of this period removes the authority's jurisdiction to entertain a rectification application, including applications seeking correction of income returned and processed under section 143(1). Accordingly, the delayed applications were treated as time-barred, their rejection was upheld, and the related appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.