Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For capital goods warehoused for manufacture or other operations, the requirement that goods be "intended for use" does not require actual installation or use in the warehouse. The notes distinguish intended use from actual use and state that, where imported goods were undisputedly intended for manufacturing operations, their later clearance for home consumption without use did not by itself attract interest on deferred customs duty. On that basis, the interest demand was treated as unsustainable, the challenged order was set aside, and consequential relief followed.
For capital goods warehoused for manufacture or other operations, the requirement that goods be "intended for use" does not require actual installation or use in the warehouse. The notes distinguish intended use from actual use and state that, where imported goods were undisputedly intended for manufacturing operations, their later clearance for home consumption without use did not by itself attract interest on deferred customs duty. On that basis, the interest demand was treated as unsustainable, the challenged order was set aside, and consequential relief followed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.